This entry will be a point that I noticed in the few definitions that I have heard of people: this is often some people to dismiss these definitions, taking a group of individuals who fall outside this definition and say that by not then the definition has to include some error.
This in my view has the problem that is not considered that because you are defining a term, probably will be some individuals and does not imply that the definition is wrong.
This probably happens because it is to define a person based on the classification of Homo sapiens, which if you include all living things belong to the category metazoa, the phylum chordata, class Mammis that we can live in society, so much of living in society is choice, and this further supported by the cases that exist on children that some events are outside of society.
However, this example serves to show a point that calls into question this line of thought because then enter society is not a decision we make, so it would be to analyze whether a person has to do to have decided or are deciding and property of a person. But this is more than enough for this entry. Aristotle Ethics
Nicomequea
Porrúa, 2007
Savater, Fernando
Ethics for Amador
Ariel, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment