da. However, I do not want anyone bald until you are sure that is what I do ... not out of duty, rather ... That is what will cure me.
On the other hand, here I stand. Stand my ground
say ... anyone remember that old entry that I published long ago?
"How naive
who was talking about Luis Fernando ...
Heh, so much has happened since that post.
Shortly after I found out why he had stopped talking to me ....
Wa, but more of that tomorrow. It's just that now I do not know ... What is the meaning of things
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Tennessee Gay Cruising Spots
onsider belong, so that someone very differently defend something that is yours to something that is not an example of this is the war between the Greeks and Persians, which despite the Persian army exceeded by much of the Greeks, they won, and one of the reasons for this is that pose as the Persian army consisted mainly slaves, they did not fight out of conviction, but simply because they were following orders, however the Greeks fought to defend to his country, something that somehow belonged to them.
So, in my opinion, the example of the shop are greatly influenced you to defend your car, however in the case of a job this is not really anything to defend the teacher, so that there would be littlergumentar of attacks to be paid (either points or money), if it could be in for the workshop.
In my opinion, a better analogy would be to compare it with a job where the boss is the teacher and student employees; in it, people get paid to do a job if they do not get paid, and if an employee performs his work too bad most likely in that run, but except in very special cases, are not charged to employees if their work is very bad.
This illustrates my question, for a discussion assuming that this happened, would it be valid or not?, I hope I can help. Monsoon
Laurencio, Luis Antonio
Talk, not fight
Without editorial, 2008
So, in my opinion, the example of the shop are greatly influenced you to defend your car, however in the case of a job this is not really anything to defend the teacher, so that there would be littlergumentar of attacks to be paid (either points or money), if it could be in for the workshop.
In my opinion, a better analogy would be to compare it with a job where the boss is the teacher and student employees; in it, people get paid to do a job if they do not get paid, and if an employee performs his work too bad most likely in that run, but except in very special cases, are not charged to employees if their work is very bad.
This illustrates my question, for a discussion assuming that this happened, would it be valid or not?, I hope I can help. Monsoon
Laurencio, Luis Antonio
Talk, not fight
Without editorial, 2008
Thursday, September 18, 2008
How To Get Thick Strong Legs
According to the agenda, write this book report Ethics for Amador by Fernando Savater inserting some of the things we've seen in class and some examples, although some may seem unlikely, not entirely WRONG. According
Savater, ethics as politics, seeking people to lead a good life, however, ethics is responsible for individuals, and that they understand why things are done a certain way. While in the case of politics, it is intended that in general all people can achieve this "good life", no matter how achieved, this means that only seeks the most favorable outcome for society.
Once this difference, what follows is to explain aaside these apparent differences, because many of these causes of division among populations were not chosen by the people. When taken as equal to others can understand their point of view, which we are putting in place and we understand that they expect from us, this Savater called, "the virtue of justice." This also helps us when we argue about something, it allows us to understand, if only in a vague way, why the opinions of others, which can help us analyze our own point of view.
But this freedom also has the consequence that we can make mistakes, so one must assume responsibility for the acts performed. An example is that in the Liceo does not really prevent us from carrying cell phones, we are free to take, but if something happens, then it is our responsibility because we who choose to wear them. This responsibility, which causes people to feel guilty by acting in a wrong way, and they feel they are doing wrong is derived from the morale of the people, because as we saw in class, moral norms are those things we can not make or stop making us feel no wrong.
The wrongdoing, however, not be used to discriminate against people who carry them out, as Savater said: "the most important thing about men is not whether his behavior seems appropriate or not, but-as to humans, I agree "(Savater, 2008). In addition,mprove would help people so that others may live better.
Finally, Savater mentioned some of the features that should be the ideal political system, once they explained what people need in order to be happy. According Savater, the ideal political system should be based on freedom, or at least to be less punitive. This (freedom), as explained above, imply that people should be more accountable for their actions. Also this system should, as the policy is based on relationships between humans, as much as possible to promote equality between people, that it would also help people with social services.
However, tambien said that the ideal political system there, and there will always be people who suffer, but there will also be people who, although "the circumstances do not allow them to take more than a relatively good life" (Savater, 2008), taking advantage of differences between ethics and politics to be happy them, and in some cases, help others to be too.
Finally, you might conclude that what the book says is that ethics is responsible for studying how people can get a good life, which is not only a happy life, that is, between humans.
Savater, Fernando
Ethics for Amador
Ariel, 2008
Shelly, Mary Frankenstein
reading
Pointtour, 2004
Savater, ethics as politics, seeking people to lead a good life, however, ethics is responsible for individuals, and that they understand why things are done a certain way. While in the case of politics, it is intended that in general all people can achieve this "good life", no matter how achieved, this means that only seeks the most favorable outcome for society.
Once this difference, what follows is to explain aaside these apparent differences, because many of these causes of division among populations were not chosen by the people. When taken as equal to others can understand their point of view, which we are putting in place and we understand that they expect from us, this Savater called, "the virtue of justice." This also helps us when we argue about something, it allows us to understand, if only in a vague way, why the opinions of others, which can help us analyze our own point of view.
But this freedom also has the consequence that we can make mistakes, so one must assume responsibility for the acts performed. An example is that in the Liceo does not really prevent us from carrying cell phones, we are free to take, but if something happens, then it is our responsibility because we who choose to wear them. This responsibility, which causes people to feel guilty by acting in a wrong way, and they feel they are doing wrong is derived from the morale of the people, because as we saw in class, moral norms are those things we can not make or stop making us feel no wrong.
The wrongdoing, however, not be used to discriminate against people who carry them out, as Savater said: "the most important thing about men is not whether his behavior seems appropriate or not, but-as to humans, I agree "(Savater, 2008). In addition,mprove would help people so that others may live better.
Finally, Savater mentioned some of the features that should be the ideal political system, once they explained what people need in order to be happy. According Savater, the ideal political system should be based on freedom, or at least to be less punitive. This (freedom), as explained above, imply that people should be more accountable for their actions. Also this system should, as the policy is based on relationships between humans, as much as possible to promote equality between people, that it would also help people with social services.
However, tambien said that the ideal political system there, and there will always be people who suffer, but there will also be people who, although "the circumstances do not allow them to take more than a relatively good life" (Savater, 2008), taking advantage of differences between ethics and politics to be happy them, and in some cases, help others to be too.
Finally, you might conclude that what the book says is that ethics is responsible for studying how people can get a good life, which is not only a happy life, that is, between humans.
Savater, Fernando
Ethics for Amador
Ariel, 2008
Shelly, Mary Frankenstein
reading
Pointtour, 2004
Eric Harris Dylan Klebold Attractive Ethics and Citizenship, "at school or on the street?
A few days ago I was listening to the radio, and by chance end up listening to a newscast, the people were talking about the reinstatement of the subjects of civics and ethics in the SEP program, and the majority opinion was that the situation violence as perceived by most people, we are living now (I can not confirm or refute this, since I have the necessary data, as well as for this entry is actually irrelevant to me) is because it had been deleted these matters.
I can not say this is false, but not how most remember their civics class in elementary school, but I, as well as more than one person with whom I spoke, I remember as a class in which we put to maker anything as long as we stay quiet, in fact I never knew he meant the title of the subject. Certainly I learned some things, but really nothing that really is relevant in that application, because "knowledge of ethics (and civics, as in this case) does not mean to know a lot of ethics" (Monzon, 2008) ie to know eg how many items does the Constitution is good to have a broader general culture, but nothing helps us in everyday life.
What I think is that, because what matters in this type of teaching is related to our daily lives, where we should teach about these issues not only in school, but where you spend most of time. Could say that this lu
I can not say this is false, but not how most remember their civics class in elementary school, but I, as well as more than one person with whom I spoke, I remember as a class in which we put to maker anything as long as we stay quiet, in fact I never knew he meant the title of the subject. Certainly I learned some things, but really nothing that really is relevant in that application, because "knowledge of ethics (and civics, as in this case) does not mean to know a lot of ethics" (Monzon, 2008) ie to know eg how many items does the Constitution is good to have a broader general culture, but nothing helps us in everyday life.
What I think is that, because what matters in this type of teaching is related to our daily lives, where we should teach about these issues not only in school, but where you spend most of time. Could say that this lu
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Dresses For A Petite 15 Year Old .:If I'm Feeling Kind Of MiXeD uP
Yeah, the same is that I put myself in the foot. And if it costs me to admit it looks good, still can not get used to looking down and Tompa with ... The enamel on the verge of being cracked.
Heh, I'm a rebel without a cause.
By the way, I discovered that if there is anything more unpleasant than I stretch in the hair with an iron, I just cut my nails and criticize how to proceed with them. Come on, I spent two months giving lessons to illiterate adults and sleeping at three in the morning to wake up at seven, not wait seriously it took me time to devote to my nails? Nah, a couple of slices careful, now. Nobody will see your feet in a rato.
No way ... Glad saint seiya the illumination has come back. And I'm glad to still further by the ominous fact that my brother, Kurai Nemessys Scriven, has decided to plot with me being Hypnos. Wa! amazing considering that the twins will be perfect. Fuck, can not wait that we start to role-play. And although it costs me to apply my cynicism dragging him here, and this should be seriously resisted, since leaving his last obsession. We
Kurai, you know you're not going to leave.
poset my tab I have to Aquarius in the SSID. Heh, now that the toolbar this repaired I proceed to take possession of my valuableand loved place. Bloody
. I must admit now that I'm in love. Yesterday I noticed after that look at me in a moment, and even more with everything he said.
Rays, despite their considerable shyness can not avoid being too obvious. Anyway ... I
flee before someone realizes that I spend my time on vent instead of looking for what is necessary for my practice of chemistry tomorrow.
Kaisel Ronsenkreüz Scriven.
[I.Have.Somebody.To.Love]
Friday, September 5, 2008
Presence Of Cm Before Period
I started to read the manual of discussions and having read the classification of the types of dialogue may see if I could classify llebava a dialogue held at the place where I was, however I found that sometimes this dialogue took on the characteristics of a conversation one of the dialgogadores was seeking information about a topic. And soon after, the dialogue seemed more a lecture, because, with information from both sides deepened on a subject without having opinions. Then I got the question: A dialogue can be pigeonholed into one genre, or a dialogue is rather dynamic and can mutate into something different from what had first tried to make?
I hope I can help.
I hope I can help.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)