onsider belong, so that someone very differently defend something that is yours to something that is not an example of this is the war between the Greeks and Persians, which despite the Persian army exceeded by much of the Greeks, they won, and one of the reasons for this is that pose as the Persian army consisted mainly slaves, they did not fight out of conviction, but simply because they were following orders, however the Greeks fought to defend to his country, something that somehow belonged to them.
So, in my opinion, the example of the shop are greatly influenced you to defend your car, however in the case of a job this is not really anything to defend the teacher, so that there would be littlergumentar of attacks to be paid (either points or money), if it could be in for the workshop.
In my opinion, a better analogy would be to compare it with a job where the boss is the teacher and student employees; in it, people get paid to do a job if they do not get paid, and if an employee performs his work too bad most likely in that run, but except in very special cases, are not charged to employees if their work is very bad.
This illustrates my question, for a discussion assuming that this happened, would it be valid or not?, I hope I can help. Monsoon
Laurencio, Luis Antonio
Talk, not fight
Without editorial, 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment